Jeroen van Dongen, Emilie Skulberg, Annelore Scholten, Ad Maas
We want to prepare and organize a Black Hole exhibition at Rijksmuseum Boerhaave and do a historical-philosophical study of black hole image in theory and observation.
The concept of a black hole has pushed science to the boundaries of what is known and what can be known about the most fundamental building blocks of nature:space, time, matter, and the laws governing these. Thus, it provides a unique opportunity for Boerhaave to shed light on cutting edge science. The exhibit will take as a central theme what the image of the black hole is, what it has been, and how these images have been formed in different research traditions. All DBHC researchers will deliver input for this, either by research or educational material. Similarly, we wish to show at Boerhaave how today’s string theorists in their highly abstract approach ‘imagine’ a black hole (see also WP4). String theory notions of black hole entropy and holography suggest that space and time are ‘emergent’. How are they currently informing black hole observational efforts? These issues offer unique opportunities to present today’s most abstract science in a museum: no museum, as far as we are aware, has ever attempted to exhibit the concepts of string theory, despite its strong hold on the public’s imagination. This exhibit, thus, will clearly innovate science communication. Finally, novel audio-visual and other educational materials will be developed that showcase DBHC research. These will feature at the exhibits of WP9-10 and circulate with open access afterwards.
With our historical-philosophical study of black hole image in theory and observation we want to answer the question: how do particular research traditions shape what is considered to be a black hole? String theorists’ insight into the microphysics of black holes is not without critics: observation is absent in such accounts. How universal is then the notion of scientific progress, and what role does empirical observation play in today’s theory construction? Furthermore, black holes cannot directly be seen (except perhaps for their still hypothetical Hawking radiation), yet are claimed to be observed all the time since the X-ray binary Cygnus-1 was identified as containing a black hole in 1972. There is a general sense that the observation of black holes has increasingly become more ‘direct’, as illustrated by the EHT’s black hole photo and LIGO’s gravitational wave detection. But what does ‘observing’ a black hole actually mean according to various groups of astronomers and physicists? What ‘images’ of a black hole are made in the various research traditions, and how have images of black holes changed in the interaction between theory and observation over time? This activity will strongly collaborate with WP1, 2, and 4. Emilie Skulberg will research how different images and understandings of black holes are tied to different traditions in modern fundamental physics, and thus offer insight on what is and what is not universal about observation and the empirical in modern day notions of scientific rationality and progress.